Shrek Revisited

*Spoilers*

Last night, I went to see Shrek at the Starlite Drive-In.  It had been a while since I had last seen the film and I wanted to see if it held up.  Surprisingly, there were parts I quite appreciated, but it was not as enjoyable for me as it was when I was younger.

Back when it was first coming out, the film was advertised as though it was going to be the next big fairytale.  There was this feeling that the film was going to be the next major animation staple, especially since past fairytale characters were included in commercials, which made me feel like I needed to see it.  Unsurprisingly, I thought it was great when I first saw it and continued to watch it for years afterwards.

This was the first time seeing it again and I did not maintain the same level of enjoyment.  A huge part of that was probably the comedy as it was not as funny as I remembered.  Part of that is because I remembered the jokes extremely well, but they still did not feel like they would have worked if I did not remember them.  However, comedy is subjective so part of that may be that my tastes may have evolved so it could still work for others.

Also, the last third part was rather dull.  It follows a lot of tropes including the third act misunderstanding, the slow build up of their relationship right before that, and the last moment attempt to stop the wedding and get the girl.  The message of “things are not always what they appear” has been done a lot as well so it can feel heavy handed.  As a result, it does not stick the landing.

However, there were still elements of the film that worked quite well.  Shrek was quite enjoyable as the main character.  He has defined and respectable goals, a sympathetic backstory, and a grumpy personality that can be relatable if you want people to leave you alone.  In a way, he was strangely endearing and I did still find myself rooting for him to win.

Donkey was an extremely good counterbalance as well.  The comedy may not have worked, but Eddie Murphy still gave him an optimistic personality that could keep Shrek moving forward even when they were at odds and bring him back to see the light when he wandered off trail.  As a result, he was still extremely likable.

The animation also held up extremely well.  The characters were constantly moving around, the visuals were inspiring, and the designs of the characters were pretty good.  Despite being almost 20 years old, the film still looks impressive.

There is a lot of Disney satire as well that was quite enjoyable for interested audiences.  Lord Farquaad looks like then Disney CEO Michael Eisner, his kingdom looks like Disney World, there are obvious shots at it like it being empty, he is constantly abusing fairytale creatures which is a metaphor for Disney using its brands to exhaustion, the list goes on and on there.  For those aware of the legendary Eisner v. Katzenberg feud, this was a nice touch.

Finally, the story for at least the first hour is pretty interesting.  This is less Shrek’s story and more he is interrupting someone else’s fairytale.  Basically, Lord Farquaad wants to get a princess, and then Shrek enters with his own problems which he can only accomplish through a deal with Farquaad.  From that perspective, it is quite interesting to see Shrek handle the events thrown at him, especially since he knows how it goes due to his own knowledge of fairytales, which lead to a lot of meta references.  For that reason, the perspective makes it much more interesting

Despite my misgivings, it is hard to understate the impact Shrek has had on animation.  It was the first animated film to win the Best Animated Feature Oscar, it made Dreamworks a household name, it convinced companies that 3-D animation was popular for non-Pixar films, and it inspired a variety of ripoffs like Hoodwinked and Happily N’ever After.  So it is hard to say Shrek does not have a place of prominence in animated history, even despite not aging as well.

Nevertheless, parts of the story are weak, the comedy does not age with the viewer, and its place in viewer hearts is largely overshadowed by its sequel.  The basic story, characters, and satire are still pretty strong, but it is far from perfect.  Inevitably, the film could be better, but is probably still worth a watch for the young or nostalgic viewer.